June 29, 2016
Dental Materials
Comparison of Indirect Restorative Dental Materials | ||||
FACTORS | ALL-PORCELAIN (ceramic) | PORCELAIN Fused to metal | GOLD ALLOYS (high noble) | BASE METAL ALLOYS (non-noble) |
General Description | Porcelain, ceramic or glass-like fillings and crowns. | Porcelain is fused to an underlying metal structure to provide strength to a filling, crown or bridge. | Alloy of gold, copper and other metals resulting in a strong, effective filling, crown or bridge. | Alloys of non-noble metals with silver appearance resulting in high strength crowns and bridges. |
Principal Uses | Inlays, onlays, crowns and aesthetic veneers. | Crowns and fixed bridges. | Inlays, onlays, crowns and fixed bridges. | Crowns, fixed bridges and partial dentures. |
Leakage and Recurrent Decay | Sealing ability depends on materials, underlying tooth structure and procedure used for placement. | The commonly used methods used for placement provide a good seal against leakage. The incidence of recurrent decay is similar to other restorative procedures. | ||
Durability | Brittle material, may fracture under heavy biting loads. Strength depends greatly on quality of bond to underlying tooth structure. | Very strong and durable. | High corrosion resistance prevents tarnishing; high strength and toughness resist fracture and wear. | |
Cavity Preparation Considerations | Because strength depends on adequate porcelain thickness, it requires more aggressive tooth reduction during preparation. | Including both porcelain and metal creates a stronger restoration than porcelain alone; moderately aggressive tooth reduction is required. | The relative high strength of metals in thin sections requires the least amount of healthy tooth structure removal. | |
Clinical Considerations | These are multiple step procedures requiring highly accurate clinical and laboratory processing. Most restorations require multiple appointments and laboratory fabrication. Moderate resistance to fracture in high-load restorations. Low resistance to fracture. Low to moderate resistance to fracture. | |||
Resistance to Wear | Highly resistant to wear, but porcelain can rapidly wear opposing teeth if its surface becomes rough. | Highly resistant to wear, but porcelain can rapidly wear opposing teeth if its surface becomes rough. | Resistant to wear and gentle to opposing teeth. | Resistant to wear and gentle to opposing teeth. |
Resistance to Fracture | Prone to fracture when placed under tension or on impact. | Porcelain is prone to impact fracture; the metal has high strength. | Highly resistant to fracture. | |
Biocompatibility | Well tolerated. | Well tolerated, but some patients may show allergenic sensitivity to base metals. | Well tolerated. | Well tolerated, but some patients may show allergenic sensitivity to base metals. |
Post-Placement Sensitivity | Sensitivity, if present, is usually not material specific. | |||
Low thermal conductivity reduces the likelihood of discomfort from hot and cold. | High thermal conductivity may result in early post-placement discomfort from hot and cold. | |||
Esthetics | Color and translucency mimic natural tooth appearance. | Porcelain can mimic natural tooth appearance, but metal limits translucency. | Metal colors do not mimic natural teeth. | |
Relative Cost to Patient | Higher; requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. | Higher; requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. | Higher; requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. | |
Average Number of Visits To Complete | Minimum of two; matching esthetics of teeth may require more visits. | Minimum of two; matching esthetics of teeth may require more visits. | Minimum of two |
NOTE: The information in this chart is provided to help dentists discuss the attributes of commonly used dental restorative materials with their patients. The chart is a simple overview of the subject based on the current dental literature. It is not intended to be comprehensive. The attributes of a particular restorative material will vary from case to case depending on a number of factors.
American Dental Association
Testimonials
One of the best dental offices in my life. Very professional and cordial staff from the front desk to the dentistry team.
Вадик-Ванадик Vadik-Vanadik
Since me and my wife moved to Florida from Nj several years ago, we were looking for good dentist, the one we can trust. We tried a few but were...
Tatiana Lapushchik (Hollywood, FL)
I don’t usually post reviews but wanted to give a shot out to DR. Gorbatov and his staff at the office. While vacationing in Florida last week, I had unbearable...
Alla Cotler
Staff was so kind from start to finish. Dr Gorbatov was so gentle I didn’t feel a thing. My teeth look beautiful! Would recommend to anyone
erika castro
I highly recommend Dr.Gorbatov dentistry . I tried so many doctors and finally I found people who knows what they do, I can trust my and my family to them....
Nuriya Deberdeeva
I feel I have the best care possible under Dr. Gorbatov and his team. His work is top quality and because of him I know my teeth and the health...
Alex P. (Fort Lauderdale, FL)
Amazing experience! The office is beautiful, the staff is knowledgeable and super friendly.
Maria Slomka
Very professional and high quality, definitely recommend to anyone wanting to feel confident with your smile