June 29, 2016
Dental Materials
Comparison of Indirect Restorative Dental Materials | ||||
FACTORS | ALL-PORCELAIN (ceramic) | PORCELAIN Fused to metal | GOLD ALLOYS (high noble) | BASE METAL ALLOYS (non-noble) |
General Description | Porcelain, ceramic or glass-like fillings and crowns. | Porcelain is fused to an underlying metal structure to provide strength to a filling, crown or bridge. | Alloy of gold, copper and other metals resulting in a strong, effective filling, crown or bridge. | Alloys of non-noble metals with silver appearance resulting in high strength crowns and bridges. |
Principal Uses | Inlays, onlays, crowns and aesthetic veneers. | Crowns and fixed bridges. | Inlays, onlays, crowns and fixed bridges. | Crowns, fixed bridges and partial dentures. |
Leakage and Recurrent Decay | Sealing ability depends on materials, underlying tooth structure and procedure used for placement. | The commonly used methods used for placement provide a good seal against leakage. The incidence of recurrent decay is similar to other restorative procedures. | ||
Durability | Brittle material, may fracture under heavy biting loads. Strength depends greatly on quality of bond to underlying tooth structure. | Very strong and durable. | High corrosion resistance prevents tarnishing; high strength and toughness resist fracture and wear. | |
Cavity Preparation Considerations | Because strength depends on adequate porcelain thickness, it requires more aggressive tooth reduction during preparation. | Including both porcelain and metal creates a stronger restoration than porcelain alone; moderately aggressive tooth reduction is required. | The relative high strength of metals in thin sections requires the least amount of healthy tooth structure removal. | |
Clinical Considerations | These are multiple step procedures requiring highly accurate clinical and laboratory processing. Most restorations require multiple appointments and laboratory fabrication. Moderate resistance to fracture in high-load restorations. Low resistance to fracture. Low to moderate resistance to fracture. | |||
Resistance to Wear | Highly resistant to wear, but porcelain can rapidly wear opposing teeth if its surface becomes rough. | Highly resistant to wear, but porcelain can rapidly wear opposing teeth if its surface becomes rough. | Resistant to wear and gentle to opposing teeth. | Resistant to wear and gentle to opposing teeth. |
Resistance to Fracture | Prone to fracture when placed under tension or on impact. | Porcelain is prone to impact fracture; the metal has high strength. | Highly resistant to fracture. | |
Biocompatibility | Well tolerated. | Well tolerated, but some patients may show allergenic sensitivity to base metals. | Well tolerated. | Well tolerated, but some patients may show allergenic sensitivity to base metals. |
Post-Placement Sensitivity | Sensitivity, if present, is usually not material specific. | |||
Low thermal conductivity reduces the likelihood of discomfort from hot and cold. | High thermal conductivity may result in early post-placement discomfort from hot and cold. | |||
Esthetics | Color and translucency mimic natural tooth appearance. | Porcelain can mimic natural tooth appearance, but metal limits translucency. | Metal colors do not mimic natural teeth. | |
Relative Cost to Patient | Higher; requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. | Higher; requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. | Higher; requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. | |
Average Number of Visits To Complete | Minimum of two; matching esthetics of teeth may require more visits. | Minimum of two; matching esthetics of teeth may require more visits. | Minimum of two |
NOTE: The information in this chart is provided to help dentists discuss the attributes of commonly used dental restorative materials with their patients. The chart is a simple overview of the subject based on the current dental literature. It is not intended to be comprehensive. The attributes of a particular restorative material will vary from case to case depending on a number of factors.
American Dental Association
Testimonials
Great experience! Really felt like Dr Gorbatov and his staff took time to explain and perform my procedures on a very short notice. Highly recommend!
Suzanne Ireland
Im from out of state visiting Florida. Broke my front crown. Searched the internet and Dr Gorbatov came up first. I walked in the next morning and they fixed my...
Michael Jonas
Dentistry has always caused me fear, and not the quality work of previous dentists is also disappointment .. Dr. Dmitry Gorbatov dispelled all fears and doubts! He showed his professionalism...
j s
I came to Dr. Gorbatov as a referral and everyone has been so friendly, kind, helpful and understanding about my nervousness. I greatly appreciate everyone’s kindness during both of my...
Rachel Fludd
This is the best dental office I’m attending. The dentist and his staff was very knowledgeable. I would recommend this office to my friends.
Irene Fishberg
Let me start by saying Dr Gorbatov is amazing, a true credit to the art of dentistry. He is a perfectionist and his assistant Lidi is amazing also in her...
Keith Miller
Absolutely amazing. Jess and Jessica at the front made me feel so comfortable and helped me conquer my fear of the dentist. The office is clean and welcoming I completely...
Hayley Kaplan (Wellington, FL)
Great staff I was nervous but they made me feel at ease. I am confident that they will give me the smile that I airways wanted. The receptionist personality is...
Uuggh uggh (West Palm Beach, FL)
Absolutely the best doctor and staff. I was afraid of any and all oral procedure. Dr Gorbatov did all my oral surgery without any pain involved. I do not even...